Home ／ Trends ／ <thought>* Source text: "週間人気配信者ランキング｜サイト別 露出量TOP30" * Target language: English. * Constraints: * Professional translator. * Output only the translation on a single line. * No quotes, no preamble, no markdown. * Keep numbers and percentages unchanged. * Do not translate brand/site names (Stripchat, Chaturbate, CamSoda, Cam4, BongaCams). * 週間 (Shūkan): Weekly * 人気 (Ninki): Popular * 配信者 (Haishinsha): Streamers / Broadcasters * ランキング (Rankingu): Ranking * ｜ (Separator): | * サイト別 (Saito-betsu): By site / Per site * 露出量 (Roshutsuryō): Exposure amount / Amount of exposure (In the context of adult streaming, this usually refers to the amount of nudity or visibility). * TOP30: Top 30 * Literal: Weekly Popular Streamer Ranking | Top 30 Exposure Amount by Site. * More natural: Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 by Exposure Amount per Site. * Concise: Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site. * "Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site" sounds professional and accurate. * Single line? Yes. * No quotes/preamble/markdown? Yes. * Numbers unchanged? Yes (30). * Brand names? None present in this specific string.</thought>Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site
<thought>* Source text: "週間人気配信者ランキング｜サイト別 露出量TOP30" * Target language: English. * Constraints: * Professional translator. * Output only the translation on a single line. * No quotes, no preamble, no markdown. * Keep numbers and percentages unchanged. * Do not translate brand/site names (Stripchat, Chaturbate, CamSoda, Cam4, BongaCams). * 週間 (Shūkan): Weekly * 人気 (Ninki): Popular * 配信者 (Haishinsha): Streamers / Broadcasters * ランキング (Rankingu): Ranking * ｜ (Separator): | * サイト別 (Saito-betsu): By site / Per site * 露出量 (Roshutsuryō): Exposure amount / Amount of exposure (In the context of adult streaming, this usually refers to the amount of nudity or visibility). * TOP30: Top 30 * Literal: Weekly Popular Streamer Ranking | Top 30 Exposure Amount by Site. * More natural: Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 by Exposure Amount per Site. * Concise: Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site. * "Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site" sounds professional and accurate. * Single line? Yes. * No quotes/preamble/markdown? Yes. * Numbers unchanged? Yes (30). * Brand names? None present in this specific string.</thought>Weekly Popular Streamer Rankings | Top 30 Exposure by Site
Observation period 2026-08-03–2026-08-09 (Mon–Sun, 7 days) ／ Updated 2026.08.10・our aggregated data
* Input: An HTML fragment in Japanese.
* Output: Translated HTML fragment in English.
* Constraints:
* Output only the translated HTML.
* No preamble, no markdown code fences.
* Keep HTML tags, attributes, and order exactly as-is.
* Translate only visible text.
* Keep numbers, percentages, dates unchanged.
* Do not translate brand/site names (Stripchat, Chaturbate, CamSoda, Cam4, BongaCams).
* Maintain neutral, factual tone.
* No adding or removing content.
* *Paragraph 1:*
* "2026年8月3日から8月9日までの1週間における、主要なライブ配信サービス5サイトの露出量ランキングを分析した。" -> Analyzed the exposure rankings of five major live streaming services for the week from August 3 to August 9, 2026.
* "今回の集計では、各サイトの上位10名に着目し、その数値の傾向を読み解く。" -> In this tally, we focus on the top 10 individuals from each site and interpret the trends in those figures.
* "サイトによって露出量の水準が大きく異なる点がまず目を引くが、これは各プラットフォームのユーザー規模や配信の仕組みを反映していると推測される。" -> It is first striking that the level of exposure varies greatly by site, which is presumed to reflect the user scale and streaming mechanisms of each platform.
* *Heading 1:*
* "プラットフォーム別に見る露出量の規模差" -> Differences in Exposure Scale by Platform
* *Paragraph 2:*
* "5サイトの中では、Chaturbateが突出して高い数値を示している。" -> Among the five sites, Chaturbate shows outstandingly high figures.
* "1位の「shena_nomy」は2,258,920と、他サイトの上位とは桁違いの露出量を記録した。" -> The 1st place "shena_nomy" recorded an exposure volume of 2,258,920, which is orders of magnitude higher than the top performers on other sites.
* "これに対し、Stripchatの1位「DuoBitches_」は121,248、Bongacamsの1位「LaraBrynn」は160,521であり、Chaturbateの1割以下にとどまる。" -> In contrast, Stripchat's 1st place "DuoBitches_" is 121,248 and BongaCams' 1st place "LaraBrynn" is 160,521, remaining at less than 10% of Chaturbate's.
* "さらにCamsodaは1位でも15,481、Cam4に至っては1位が5,098と、サイト間の格差は顕著である。" -> Furthermore, CamSoda's 1st place is 15,481 and Cam4's 1st place is 5,098, making the disparity between sites prominent.
* "同じ「1位」でも、その実質的な影響力には大きな開きがあると言える。" -> It can be said that even for the same "1st place," there is a significant gap in actual influence.
* *Heading 2:*
* "上位層の分布と競争の様相" -> Distribution of Top Tiers and Aspects of Competition
* *Paragraph 3:*
* "各サイト内の順位間の差にも特徴が見られる。" -> Characteristics are also seen in the differences between rankings within each site.
* "Chaturbateでは1位と2位の差が約44万と大きいが、2位以下は比較的密集しており、上位層の中でも一部の配信者が突出している様子がうかがえる。" -> In Chaturbate, the difference between 1st and 2nd place is large at approximately 440,000, but those from 2nd place onwards are relatively clustered, suggesting that some streamers stand out even among the top tier.
* "Stripchatでは1位と2位が僅差で、この2名が3位以下を大きく引き離している点が特徴的だ。" -> In Stripchat, 1st and 2nd place are close, and it is characteristic that these two significantly distance themselves from 3rd place and below.
* "一方、Bongacamsでは1位の「LaraBrynn」が2位以下に6万以上の差をつけており、一人が強い存在感を示している。" -> On the other hand, in BongaCams, 1st place "LaraBrynn" has a difference of over 60,000 from 2nd place and below, showing a strong presence.
* "CamsodaとCam4は全体的に数値が小さく、順位間の差もなだらかで、上位層が拮抗している状況が読み取れる。" -> CamSoda and Cam4 have overall small figures and gradual differences between rankings, indicating a situation where the top tier is closely contested.
* "これらの差は、配信者の固定ファンの規模や配信頻度、サイト内の競争環境を反映している可能性があるが、今回のデータからは因果関係までは特定できない。" -> These differences may reflect the size of the streamers' fixed fan bases, streaming frequency, or the competitive environment within the site, but causal relationships cannot be identified from this data.
* Check against constraints:
* HTML tags preserved? Yes.
* No preamble/markdown? Yes.
* Numbers/dates unchanged? Yes.
* Brand names unchanged? Yes.
* Neutral tone? Yes.
* No added/removed content? Yes.
Analyzed the exposure rankings of five major live streaming services for the week from August 3 to August 9, 2026. In this tally, we focus on the top 10 individuals from each site and interpret the trends in those figures. It is first striking that the level of exposure varies greatly by site, which is presumed to reflect the user scale and streaming mechanisms of each platform.
Differences in Exposure Scale by Platform
Among the five sites, Chaturbate shows outstandingly high figures. The 1st place "shena_nomy" recorded an exposure volume of 2,258,920, which is orders of magnitude higher than the top performers on other sites. In contrast, Stripchat's 1st place "DuoBitches_" is 121,248 and BongaCams' 1st place "LaraBrynn" is 160,521, remaining at less than 10% of Chaturbate's. Furthermore, CamSoda's 1st place is 15,481 and Cam4's 1st place is 5,098, making the disparity between sites prominent. It can be said that even for the same "1st place," there is a significant gap in actual influence.
Distribution of Top Tiers and Aspects of Competition
Characteristics are also seen in the differences between rankings within each site. In Chaturbate, the difference between 1st and 2nd place is large at approximately 440,000, but those from 2nd place onwards are relatively clustered, suggesting that some streamers stand out even among the top tier. In Stripchat, 1st and 2nd place are close, and it is characteristic that these two significantly distance themselves from 3rd place and below. On the other hand, in BongaCams, 1st place "LaraBrynn" has a difference of over 60,000 from 2nd place and below, showing a strong presence. CamSoda and Cam4 have overall small figures and gradual differences between rankings, indicating a situation where the top tier is closely contested. These differences may reflect the size of the streamers' fixed fan bases, streaming frequency, or the competitive environment within the site, but causal relationships cannot be identified from this data.
These figures are aggregated hourly by our site from publicly available information on each streaming site and may differ from the actual values reported by each service.
